
"Standard Radar Frequency Letter-Band Nomenclature"
(IEEE Standard 521-1984)
| Band | Frequency (GHz) |
| L | 1.0 - 2.0 |
| S | 2.0 - 4.0 |
| C | 4.0 - 8.0 |
| X | 8 - 12 |
| Ku | 12 - 18 |
| K | 18 - 27 |
| Ka | 27 - 40 |
| V | 40 - 75 |
| W | 75 - 110 |
|
ARRL HAM BAND DESIGNATORS, used for CONTESTS & throughout this site. Data without question marks is believed correct. Know better or can
replace question marks?
E-Mail!!
|
| Band |
Frequency |
Wave- length |
Terrestrial Calling Frequencies (MHz) |
Narrowband- Horizontal Polarization |
Wideband/FM (Polarizat'n) |
| A |
50-54 MHZ |
6m |
50.125 |
52.525 (V) |
| B |
144-148 MHZ |
2m |
144.2 |
146.52 (V) |
| C |
222-225 MHZ |
135cm |
222.1 |
223.5 (V) |
| D |
420-450 MHZ |
70cm |
432.1 |
446.0 (V) |
| 9 |
902-928 MHZ |
33cm |
902.1 (Note#1, below) E. Coast & NW: 903.1 |
927.5 (North CA) (V) 906.5 elsewhere? (V) |
| E |
1240-1300 MHZ |
23cm |
1296.1 |
1294.5 (V) |
| F |
2300-2310 & 2390-2450 MHZ |
13cm |
2304.1 2304.2 (Canada) |
2304.5 & 2394.5 (?) 2305.2 (Canada & ARRL) (?) |
| US EME 2304.1, EU EME 2320.1, JA EME 2424.1 |
| G |
3300-3500 MHZ |
9cm |
3456.1 |
?? (?) |
| H |
5650-5925 MHZ |
5cm |
5760.1 |
?? (?) |
| I |
10-10.5 GHZ |
3cm |
10,368.1 |
10,250 & 10,280 (H) 10,450
(Canada) (?) 10,364.0 (ARRL) (?) |
| J |
24-24.25 GHZ |
12mm |
24,192.1 24,000.1 (Canada) |
24,125.0 & 24,155.0 (H) |
| K |
47-47.2 GHZ |
6mm |
47,088.1 (UK & US) 47,000.1 (Canada) 47,040.1 elswhere |
?? (?) |
| M |
75.5-81 GHZ |
4mm |
by prearrangement |
| N |
122.25-123 GHZ |
2.5mm |
by prearrangement |
| P |
134-141 GHZ |
2mm |
by prearrangement |
| R |
241-250 GHZ |
1.2mm |
by prearrangement |
| S |
Above 300 GHZ |
<1mm |
by prearrangement |
| L |
Light |
-- |
by prearrangement |
|
NOTES:
#1 - 903 was initially chosen over 902 because it allowed more commonly available xtals to be
used in the transverter. FCC part 15 devices must put out about 70 dB less energy on 901.999
as they as they are allowed on 902.001. Since these inexpensive devices hardly have multipole
interdigital filters, they meet spec by staying away from the edges of the band. In many
metropolitical areas there is as much as 10 dB difference between the noise floor at 902.1 vs
903.1 As as we get more wireless phones, VCR Rabbits, and wireless can openers, it's only
going to get worse. For serious work on 33cm we really should be looking at 902.010 MHz! Just
remember, most IF rigs are a lot easier to tune up to 145 MHz so you are on 903, that to tune
the IF rig down to 143 MHz for 902. - WA5VJB
|
|
|
The following are links to various band plans
we have identified around the world. More will be added as they are discovered.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
[HOME]
[NETS]
[CALENDAR]
[REFLECTOR]
[CONTACT US]
[REGISTER]
[TECH FORUM]
[RELATED SITES]
[PROPAGATION]
[THE BANDS]
[RMG APPLICATION]
|
go to the top
This Page Last Updated: 4 September 2006
Feedback: Paul S. Goble, III, ND2X
Copyright © 1999 - 2006 by ND2X, all rights reserved
|